The wheels of Justice grind slowly, pick up speed, and crush corruption. The balance of power is a fresh breeze. It’s a joy to behold and a reason for real hope (which makes a good breakfast but a lousy supper). These two weeks were a feast, after years of prep, prayer, and fight. Great article Profe.
Well spake, Larry. As I'll be writing later in the week, I think MAGA planners sees two tracks to victory, slow and procedural or fast and chaotic, depending on whether Dems feel they can get away with another steal in 2022. (SCOTUS may well be willing to take up 2020 challenges on even into Spring 2023, once substantive issues can be raised, vs procedural). Fast track, going full throttle 1776, will be a lot messier, and less preferred. IMO
Disclaimer: This is not a personal attack and is not to be treated as one. This comment is intended to highlight the error seen in the above comment.
Dear Mr. Bushmills,
I have noticed that you are using the term “less preferred” to describe what I believe you mean as a revolution. To begin our discussion, we must define our terms.
"Less preferred" means something that is not as liked or desired as something else.
Are you suggesting that a violent overthrow of the government is less preferred than a peaceful change of power? Do you imply that such actions, which were expressly warned against by our founders, should be undertaken? I think not. Furthermore, I believe your reference to the “1776” event might be better described in the context of an “1861” event.
Mr. Bushmills, I hope you do not believe that it is acceptable to resort to violence against those with differing ideologies. If you would allow me, I suggest we look to the examples of Christ, or, if that does not resonate with you, perhaps consider figures like Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., or the Buddha. It would be beneficial for you to engage in open conversation with a Democrat to recognize that they, too, have the country’s best interests at heart. Of course, this does not apply to everyone, but the same can be said for Republicans—there are both good and bad among us.
I hope I have not offended you unduly. In closing, I wish you a wonderful rest of your day. Thank you, Mr. Bushmills.
Respectfully,
A Concerned Citizen
Bodybuilder, Student, Moderate Republican, and Follower of Christ.
The wheels of Justice grind slowly, pick up speed, and crush corruption. The balance of power is a fresh breeze. It’s a joy to behold and a reason for real hope (which makes a good breakfast but a lousy supper). These two weeks were a feast, after years of prep, prayer, and fight. Great article Profe.
Very nice summary of the Courts achievements. Thank you, President Trump!!!
Well spake, Larry. As I'll be writing later in the week, I think MAGA planners sees two tracks to victory, slow and procedural or fast and chaotic, depending on whether Dems feel they can get away with another steal in 2022. (SCOTUS may well be willing to take up 2020 challenges on even into Spring 2023, once substantive issues can be raised, vs procedural). Fast track, going full throttle 1776, will be a lot messier, and less preferred. IMO
I don't think it can come to that. We just can't allow them to even think they can steal another one. That would result in bloodshed.
Trump absolutely must be building a "Merrill's Mauraders" right now who can come in and gut many of these Deep State agencies.
Disclaimer: This is not a personal attack and is not to be treated as one. This comment is intended to highlight the error seen in the above comment.
Dear Mr. Bushmills,
I have noticed that you are using the term “less preferred” to describe what I believe you mean as a revolution. To begin our discussion, we must define our terms.
"Less preferred" means something that is not as liked or desired as something else.
Are you suggesting that a violent overthrow of the government is less preferred than a peaceful change of power? Do you imply that such actions, which were expressly warned against by our founders, should be undertaken? I think not. Furthermore, I believe your reference to the “1776” event might be better described in the context of an “1861” event.
Mr. Bushmills, I hope you do not believe that it is acceptable to resort to violence against those with differing ideologies. If you would allow me, I suggest we look to the examples of Christ, or, if that does not resonate with you, perhaps consider figures like Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., or the Buddha. It would be beneficial for you to engage in open conversation with a Democrat to recognize that they, too, have the country’s best interests at heart. Of course, this does not apply to everyone, but the same can be said for Republicans—there are both good and bad among us.
I hope I have not offended you unduly. In closing, I wish you a wonderful rest of your day. Thank you, Mr. Bushmills.
Respectfully,
A Concerned Citizen
Bodybuilder, Student, Moderate Republican, and Follower of Christ.