Was the polio vax for nothing?

At least one author says polio was disappearing before the safe vaxxes

Several years ago I watched a captivating documentary called “The River,” about the origins of AIDs in the oral polio vaccine research done in the Belgian Congo. Edward Hooper, a BBC correspondent and UN official, discovered that the organs of chimpanzees were used instead of those of green monkeys; and that these organs contained a simian version of AIDs; and the AIDs epidemic started in these polio vaxxes by human error. Hooper has everything but the final, undeniable proof. But in his research he carefully traced when AIDs appeared, what the connection was to the OPV vaccine (NOT the Sabin oral polio vaccine but that of his competitor), and how merely the difference of which simian was used for research could unleash hell among humans.

Now, a more recent history of polio itself, by contrarian Forrest Maready, The Moth in the Iron Lung, argues that what we call polio (or poliomyelitis, which is “inflammation of the grey matter on the spinal cord") was not a new virus (as we have come to think of the “poliovirus” but rather the result of metal poisoning through lead, mercury, and arsenates in infants’ bodies. Maready claims that the disease did not generally affect adults because the spinal cord ending in adults had grown higher, but in infants the spinal cord ending was alongside the lower bowels. There, the interaction of metals from pesticides, he argues, led to transmission into the spinal column. Worse, many of the medicines still in used involved arsenic and other metals.

Humans, who had enterovirus infections, were generally not in danger of it spreading to their neurological system, but infants with intestines compromised by metallic pesticides, were.

Maready points to the arrival of the gypsy moth in America and its astonishing destructive power as the point when metallic pesticides, ultimately leading to DDT, were introduced. Eventually, the first of these pesticides were withdrawn after health concerns, but not before they had produced the weakened guts in babies that allowed their spinal cords to be attacked. He then tracks subsequent outbreaks of polio, linking each to pesticide dispersals, culminating with the Los Angeles “Virus X” epidemic in 1947 whose symptoms in adults looked like the early symptoms of polio in children. At the time, our reliable friend, the Food and Drug Administration, denied any link between DDT and “Virus X.”

Polio began to decline in frequency beginning in 1952, but there was a tick upward in 1958, and during this time . . . wait for it . . . over 1,000 people who had received at least three doses of the Salk injected vax had come down with polio! No effort was made to find out if the vax itself may have provoked the poliovirus. However, the Salk vaccine replicated in the blood, while the enteroviruses replicated in the intestines.

In short, it is entirely possible that the Salk vax, while it could protect from paralysis, it could not stop the disease itself from spreading in the body. Worse, the original roll-out of the Salk vaccine in 1955 had contained bad batches that had to be recalled.

The head of the Committee on Evaluation and Standards of the American Public Health Association said “one of the most obvious pieces of misunderstanding . . . is that the 50% rise in paralytic poliomyelitis in 1958 and the real accelerated increase in 1959 have been caused by persons failing to be vaccinated. This represents . . . an unwillingness to face facts and to evaluate the true effectiveness of the Salk vaccine. If the Salk vaccine is to take credit for the decline from 1955-1957, how can those individuals who were vaccinated several years ago contribute to the increase in 1958 and 1959? Are not these persons still vaccinated?” That is the question people ask today of the China Virus vaxxes.

Doctors were clearly uncomfortable with the Salk vaccine and waited breathlessly for a live poliovirus vax that would create attenuated versions of polio by passing it through animal tissue. This weakened version of polio would then be administered orally to children to produce genuine immunity.

Maready concludes that the proclivity for the poliovirus infections to strike at the bottom of the spinal cord adjacent to the intestines (where they are harbored) suggests a direct route.

But why the sudden reduction of polio in 1955, 1956, and 1957? Without getting into the weeds on the nature of the change, it simply was a change in how polio was reported. Maready rejects a “conspiracy” to hide the inefficacy of the Salk vax, but rather it was a case of attempting to standardize diagnostic criteria. But it had the effect of making the Salk vax look like a miracle worker.

Our current experience with the China Virus vaxxes, with their massive inefficiencies, in their failures to even remotely perform as promised, with the never-ending parade of “just one more vax will do it” mandates suggests that Maready, like Hooper, may not have the smoking gun. But they both have bodies, means, motive, and opportunity to claim that modern-day vaccines—-while absolutely effective in many cases—-are just as absolutely inappropriate in others. Scientists and medical practitioners go from lifesaving heroes to criminal culprits when they refuse to acknowledge that in fact such a difference exists.

Larry Schweikart

Rock drummer

Film maker

NYTimes #1 bestselling author

Political pundit

For even more truth-based current events, politics, and history content + resources, check out my VIP membership below

https://www.wildworldofhistory.com/vip