NEITHER CROMWELL NOR CHURCHILL CAN SAVE ENGLAND
Mediocre Britain sealed its own fate with immigration and woke
A friend—-I’ll call him Lancelot—-pondered whether a Churchill or a Cromwell could step in and save England, perhaps even all of Europe. I had to pop his balloon and say “NYET!”
In Cromwell’s time, Puritans made up a minority of the English people, but a wealthy and politically active minority. Cromwell’s New Model Army defeated the royalist forces to assume power. Though he called his administration the “Protectorate” and indeed claimed to be holding it for the rightful king, Cromwell acted in near-dictatorial fashion.
There is no Cromwell scenario for Britain’s rescue. The most politically active people in England are the Muslims and the woke crowd, not the forces of resistance. Moreover, the religious fervor that drove the Puritans to back Cromwell is entirely missing in the non-Muslim population of Mediocre Britain. In other words, they haev neither the numbers nor the fire for a revolution.
What about a Churchill? Could a great elected leader save the day? Sadly, no. Churchill was greatly respected when he came to be Prime Minister in 1940, despite many bad predictions. But where he was right, he was exceedingly right. He had warned of Hitler for almost a decade and the British people remembered. Moreover, while it was reluctant, he had the support of both Parliament and the King, as well, of course, of the people. There is no person even remotely on the English stage today who could command Parliament or the people. Again, the Brits are stuck with a steady decline that could, given their energy policies, turn into a rapid death spiral.
Consider: Kier Starmer has made squealing sounds about sending the British Army to Ukraine. It’s highly likely that Mediocre Britain could not deploy much more than a true, outfitted full division of under 20,000 men. They have two aircraft carriers, the more modern of which, the Prince of Wales, has been repeatedly back in port for repairs. Neither ship is a long-deck carrier: both are “STOL” (Short Take-Off and Landing) carriers only capable of limited strike ranges. But to make matters worse, the last two British steel blast furnaces have shut down, leaving Mediocre Britain with . . . none. How are they to make tanks? Or ships to carry troops to Ukraine?
England lost any hope of survival when it became de-Christianized on the one hand and Islamified on the other. When Spain booted out the Muslims in 1492, it was a thoroughly Christian nation, giving it a glue to hold the different kingdoms together. No such glue exists in Mediocre Britain. Many of the largest cities have Muslim mayors. Sharia law is right around the corner.
As if that wasn’t bad enough, where the Islamic flag does not fly, the rainbow flag does. England has become so DEI-ed (except when it applies to justice for Muslims) that it couldn’t muster the resolve to fight the serious reverse immigration war that would be needed. Ukraine has only opened another vein in this already bleeding corpse.
And it gets even worse. Mediocre Britain is representative of the other so-called “Great Powers” of Europe, namely Germany and France. This week the French used lawfare to prevent Marine le Pen from running for Prime Minister, a slot in the next election she would be possibly favored to win. Germany has already shown it cannot be trusted either with civil rights or with common-sense military power.
Alas, Europe b screwed.
https://www.wildworldofhistory.com/offers/9qFBdu2r
Larry Schweikart (@LarrySchwe94560)
Rock drummer, Film maker,NYTimes #1 bestselling author
Link for Patriot’s History Vimeo
Link to buy larry a coffee
http://buymeacoffee.com/larrys
Sadly, I have no choice but to agree that Europe may be in terminal decline, led by the UK and Germany, with France not far behind.